Three, Arminian Corporate Election (CE) has the erroneous idea that Christ Himself is the group. In close association with the previous flaw (part 2), Arminian CE teaches that Jesus is essentially the group Himself—as the corporate Head of the group. But this cannot be, since the group is the Church, and Christ died for the Church and He is Head […]
Two: Arminian Corporate Election (CE) fails to factor-in the two-fold election of Christ, which disallows the idea that we can share in His election. Arminian CE describes election in a manner that only takes in one aspect of Christ’s election. While it acknowledges that Jesus was chosen to be both the Corporate Head of the Church and its Savior, it fails to factor-in His election […]
(Please read Introduction first) Four Major Flaws of Arminian Corporate Election (CE) I have a lot of respect for the Arminian view of CE. It presents a scholarly and fairly plausible interpretation of the doctrine of election. There are certain aspects to that position that I agree with. I think it has the right basic idea, […]
Introduction Union and Identification vs. Actual Sovereign Choice Corporate Election (CE) is normally associated with Arminian theology. However, it can be argued that CE is fundamentally a Calvinist position on the doctrine of election — which I shall do in this study. Central debate: Is election merely one of union and identification? Or is […]
Introduction When studying the doctrine of election, I believe the starting point must be Ephesians 1:4. The reason I say that is because, number one, it’s so plainly stated. There’s no other passage in the Bible quite like it, especially within the context that it’s written. But also, after considering all other interpretations, […]
Introduction Most Christians who follow social media are probably aware of the ongoing debate between complementarianism and egalitarianism, which refer to the roles of men and women in the church and home. This debate is perhaps at an all time high, because not only is there a good case to be made for both positions, but social media provides […]
First of all, I’d like to give you a brief background about my journey in regard to the doctrine of election and the atonement of Christ. For most of my life I was a non-Calvinist (Arminian/Provisionist). I believed that Christ died for every person who came into the world. For years I had a […]
Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture quotations are from the 1901 American Standard Version. (2 Peter 3:1-13) – 1 This is now, beloved, the second epistle that I write unto you; and in both of them I stir up your sincere mind by putting you in remembrance; 2 that ye should remember the words which were spoken before by the […]
Introduction I want to talk about a passage that I believe provides an unmistakable interpretation of the “thousand years” of Rev 20:1-7. We must always keep in mind that the book of Revelation is a New Testament book, and so we must allow the rest of the NT to interpret this book for us. If you read my […]
All Scriptures are taken from the 1901 American Standard Version unless otherwise noted. Introduction One of the most important passages of Scripture in determining whether or not there is an end of time millennial kingdom, is 1 Corinthians 15. In this chapter, Paul not only reveals what the Kingdom of Christ is, but also the timing of it. And as […]
![Arminian CE vs. Calvinist CE (Christ as the Group) — [3 of 4]](https://i0.wp.com/christocentricbiblicalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/IMG_5064.png?resize=1160%2C653&ssl=1)
![Complementarianism vs. Egalitarianism – [Three Major Keys]](https://i0.wp.com/christocentricbiblicalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/IMG_3879.jpeg?resize=1160%2C653&ssl=1)
![Kingdom of Christ Now — [2 Peter 3:1-13]](https://i0.wp.com/christocentricbiblicalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/IMG_4391.png?resize=1160%2C653&ssl=1)